[EMAIL PROTECTED] was written successfully > I think they are shooting for 1) a lot more bandwidth than Ricochet ever delivered 2) a lot more users than Ricochet ever had 3) a lot more reliability than Ricochet ever had
At a large event, such as another GroundZero, there will never be enough bandwidth nor cpu power for all the info requests on such an event. No mesh network would be able to take the huge amount of traffic involved in such a crisis situation. A mesh network would keel over in all the VoIP traffic alone and even then the dispatch center would be overwhelmed by all the voice traffic. Ricochet performed very well in the post recovery event. I I would use something we can use NOW than build a fictional infastructure that does not exist even in reality. I don't see any 802.11g VoIP handheld radios nor anything remotely close on the market. Lets use what is here now. but true, a billion is a lot. you'd think they could find a slightly more economical way to do it. but as long as the Homeland Security spigot is open, you can expect proposals like these to help make it flow faster into NYC. f you have been paying any attention to what just happened in Washington, Congress just shafted NYC AGAIN for Homeland Security funds. adam On Jun 21, 2004, at 11:38 AM, AdamVazquez wrote: > Another refried answer. > > If NYC had bothered to noticed we already have the infastructure > installed in the Richochet network installed in most utility poles in > the city. Quite a few got pulled in the springtime annual cleaning of > DOT. > > -- NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/ Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/ Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
