Considering that the FCC recently fined one U.S. ISP for blocking VOIP
ports, it's hard to believe that another U.S. ISP would try this. I guess
it's possible though I think it's more likely that the problem may just be
due to congestion.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf 
> Of Dustin Goodwin
> Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 12:39 PM
> To: nycwireless@lists.nycwireless.net
> Subject: [nycwireless] Article: Trouble on the line (About 
> vonage be blocked/degraded by ISPs)
> 
> 
> Anyone had to drop Vonage because of suspicious quality issues?
> 
> - Dustin -
> 
> http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,,1747343,00.html
> 
> *hursday April 6, 2006
> The Guardian <http://www.guardian.co.uk>*
> 
> Theodore Peckler lives in Monrovia, California, and is one of the 1.5 
> million people in the US who uses Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) 
> systems to make cheap phone calls via his cable modem connection. But 
> last year, after five months using the VoIP service from the 
> US provider 
> Vonage without problems, he noticed an abrupt deterioration. 
> "The line 
> was choppy, very choppy and you could not understand any 
> words spoken," 
> he recalls. Puzzled, Peckler ran pingplotter - a program to detect 
> problems such as packet loss and latency (delays in sending over the 
> separate "packets" of internet traffic). It revealed major latency 
> between his cable modem and local internet service provider (ISP).
> 
> --
> NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
> Un/Subscribe: 
> http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
> Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 268.3.5/302 - Release 
> Date: 4/5/2006
> 
> 

--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/

Reply via email to