Cellular broadband will someday be a viable alternative to wired
broadband. That said, it is highly doubtful wireless cellular broadband
will ever be as fast as wired solutions. So for the foreseeable future
we will be stuck with the cable/telco duopoloy. While a robust free and
open market place for broadband services may or may not lead to the
ability to choose a neutral carrier it is by no means guaranteed. The
article is operating on a false premise.
- Dustin -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WSJ has a right-leaning editorial board and the snark in this article
shows it. They're talking about how Sprint taking up Wimax negates
the whole idea of net neutrality or Internet regulation.
MY question is: will WiMax really enable fair competition? Or will
it just make the duopoly into an oligopoly? What does WiMax really
represent?
Rob
---
From the Wall Street Journal --
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB115508153993630488.html?mod=opinion_main_review_and_outlooks
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
--
NYCwireless - http://www.nycwireless.net/
Un/Subscribe: http://lists.nycwireless.net/mailman/listinfo/nycwireless/
Archives: http://lists.nycwireless.net/pipermail/nycwireless/
