I totally agree with Rick. 

On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 07:51 PM, rc...@nyc.rr.com wrote:

Karen:  Don’t confuse lack of interest with folks not having enough 
expertise on the topic to feel they are qualified to contribute to the 
discussion (e.g., me).  I for, one, was fascinated, and look forward to 
further developments.
 
Rick Cech
 
P.S.  Also add kudos for the fine tern id discussion, Joe, Shai & 
others. We’re fortunate to have individuals in the community with such 
depths of insight and experience.
 
From: bounce-122638804-3714...@list.cornell.edu 
<bounce-122638804-3714...@list.cornell.edu> On Behalf Of Karen Fung
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 2:46 PM
To: nysbirds-L@cornell.edu
Subject: [nysbirds-l] Henslows Sparrow redux: Shawangunk Grasslands, NWR 
(Ulster County)
 
Hi All,
A few weeks ago, I posted a query to the list, noting that this year's 
Henslow's Sparrow at Shawangunk is singing a different song compared to 
the single song recorded by multiple observers last year, and wondering 
if that was enough of an indication that this year's bird is a different 
individual.  That post did not really elicit much interest, based on the 
little feedback I received.

 

Since then, I wrote to a few people directly, including Nathan Pieplow, 
whose book, "Peterson Field Guide to Bird Sounds of Eastern North 
America", was published last year. Am including my direct query to him. 
Nathan agrees that this year's bird is almost certainly a different 
individual, and he gave me permission to post his reply, which you will 
see below.

 

For those interested, the screen shot of the spectrograms that I sent to 
him is now online on my website, in this gallery. You can see from the 
screen shot that the first four spectrograms show a "Mi-Re-Do" sequence 
of notes, and they are all from this year's bird. The remaining 
spectrograms show a "Mi-Do-Re" type sequence of notes. Both three 
syllable "songs", just a different sequence of sounds.

 

https://www.birdsiviews.com/Henslows-Sparrow-Shawangunk-Grasslands/ 
<https://www.birdsiviews.com/Henslows-Sparrow-Shawangunk-Grasslands/>

 

If you want to see and play back the entire eBird collection of 
spectrograms and audio files for both Shawangunk birds, the link is 
here:

 

https://ebird.org/media/catalog?taxonCode=henspa&mediaType=a&region=Ulster,%20New%20York,%20United%20States%20(US)&regionCode=US-NY-111&q=Henslow%27s%20Sparrow%20-%20Ammodramus%20henslowii
 
<https://ebird.org/media/catalog?taxonCode=henspa&mediaType=a&region=Ulster,%20New%20York,%20United%20States%20(US)&regionCode=US-NY-111&q=Henslow%27s%20Sparrow%20-%20Ammodramus%20henslowii>

 

Nathan's reply and my query to him follow here.

 

--------------

 

Karen,

 

Thanks for the email! I'm very glad you like my book. We need to get 
more people using it!

 

I'm about as certain as I can be that the 2018 bird is a different 
individual than the 2017 bird. Here's why:

·  Henslow's is a poorly studied species. But in the research for my 
book, I never found a documented case of an individual Henslow's 
switching songtypes on a recording.
·  You've got a pretty good sample size of recordings here. I went 
through all the 2018 recordings and every rendition is identical. I 
didn't go through all the 2017 recordings but in my sample, they were 
all identical to each other and different from the 2018 bird.
·  All the 2017 and 2018 recordings in your sample are stereotyped, not 
plastic. This basically ensures the recordings come from adult birds. It 
has been shown in many passerine species that once birds are adults, 
they cannot learn new songs. A few birds have been shown to break this 
rule (like Northern Mockingbird), but it would be a surprise for 
Henslow's Sparrow.
·  The 2017 and 2018 songs differ in many details -- one is not merely a 
truncation of the other. 

This is actually a pretty good test case for the number of songtypes per 
individual Henslow's Sparrow. If birders visit the same bird many times 
over the course of a season and never document any song variation, it's 
very good evidence that each individual has a single songtype. Plus, it 
happens to fit with the little we know about song in Henslow's, and a 
great deal that we know about song in passerines in general.

 

So, I'd say you have a new bird this year.

 


 

Nathan


 
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 3:59 AM, Karen Fung <easternblueb...@gmail.com 
<mailto:easternblueb...@gmail.com> > wrote:

Dear Nathan,

I very much enjoyed your presentation at the Linnaean Society (NY) last 
year, and bought your book as soon as it came out.  I grew up playing 
the piano as a hobby, so am used to seeing sounds presented in visual 
form.  Spectrograms are a great aid in learning bird song!

 

Anyway, I'm writing to hopefully get your thoughts on whether you think 
the male Henslow's Sparrow that is currently singing at Shawangunk 
Grasslands NWR (NY: Ulster County) is a different bird from last year's 
since its spectrogram is slightly different.  See below for part of an 
email that I sent to local birders.  Was told that Henslow's hasn't 
nested at Shawungunk in maybe 30 years, and that last year's sighting 
was the first one documented in recent memory.  That alone made some 
folks think that the current bird had to be the same one as last year's 
due to its rarity.  Last year it was around for maybe ten days, singing 
incessantly.  This year it also sings non-stop, but the sequence of 
notes is different.  This year it has a mate, so could it be singing a 
different song just based on that fact?  Your book seemed to indicate 
that Henslow's only has one song in its repertoire.. but could it have 
modulated its song between seasons?.  Some birders agree that it is 
likely to be a different bird, based on its different song, plus its 
plumage appears to be paler this year (but I'm not sure how to evaluate 
plumage if the bird has molted).

 

Any thoughts would be appreciated.  The attached screen shot was taken a 
few days ago.  The link to the eBird data for the audio files is below.

 

Best Wishes,

Karen Fung

Manhattan



 

 

 

--

NYSbirds-L List Info:

Welcome and Basics <http://www.northeastbirding.com/NYSbirdsWELCOME.htm>

Rules and Information 
<http://www.northeastbirding.com/NYSbirdsRULES.htm>

Subscribe, Configuration and Leave 
<http://www.northeastbirding.com/NYSbirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm>

Archives:

The Mail Archive 
<http://www.mail-archive.com/nysbirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html>

Surfbirds <http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NYSBirds-L>

ABA <http://birding.aba.org/maillist/NY01>

Please submit your observations to eBird 
<http://ebird.org/content/ebird/> !

--



                        --

                

                        NYSbirds-L List Info:

                

                        Welcome and Basics 
<http://www.northeastbirding.com/NYSbirdsWELCOME.htm>

                

                        Rules and Information 
<http://www.northeastbirding.com/NYSbirdsRULES.htm>

                

                        Subscribe, Configuration and Leave 
<http://www.northeastbirding.com/NYSbirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm>

                

                        Archives:

                

                        The Mail Archive 
<http://www.mail-archive.com/nysbirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html>

                

                        Surfbirds 
<http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NYSBirds-L>

                

                        ABA <http://birding.aba.org/maillist/NY01>

                

                        Please submit your observations to eBird 
<http://ebird.org/content/ebird/> !

                

                        --



--

NYSbirds-L List Info:
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsWELCOME.htm
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsRULES.htm
http://www.NortheastBirding.com/NYSbirdsSubscribeConfigurationLeave.htm

ARCHIVES:
1) http://www.mail-archive.com/nysbirds-l@cornell.edu/maillist.html
2) http://www.surfbirds.com/birdingmail/Group/NYSBirds-L
3) http://birding.aba.org/maillist/NY01

Please submit your observations to eBird:
http://ebird.org/content/ebird/

--

Reply via email to