Hi, On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Bart van der Schans <b.vandersch...@onehippo.com> wrote: > I've thinking about similar in memory strategies ;-) Especially with > leveraging one of the existing in-memory data grid solutions > (hazelcast, infinispan, etc) which can take care of most of the > clustering details and the long term/backup/disk storage. I think this > is also what ModeShape 3.0 is doing with infinispan[1].
Yep, both Hazelcast and Infinispan would be interesting alternatives as backends for such a microkernel. > But I guess > that would require a different architecture than is now implemented in > oak which has a more of a distributed (git like) structure with > options to scale (out) with sharding (I actually might be wrong on > this point since I'm not (yet) that familiar with the architecture). So far we've managed to keep the Oak architecture general enough to allow backends like the one outlined here. BR, Jukka Zitting
