On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Stefan Guggisberg
> <stefan.guggisb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> - returning an :id and/or :hash should be optional, i.e. we shouldn't
>> require an implementation to return an :id or :hash for every path
>
> Exactly.
>
>> - i suggest we prefix the id/path getNodes parameter value with ':id:'
>> and ':hash:'
>
> I'd leave the format up to the MK implementation to decide, with
> oak-core just passing whatever the MK gave as the ":id" or ":hash"
> attribute of a child object. For example, an MK that selects to use
> ":id:" and ":hash:" prefixes for such values, would work something
> like this:
>
> getNodes("/") => { "a": { ":id": ":id:x" } }
> getNodes(":id:x") => { "b": { :id": ":id:y" } }
> getNodes(":id:y") => { "c": { :id": ":id:z"} }
> getNodes(":id:z") => {}
ok, agreed.
cheers
stefan
>
>> - do you have a proposal for the suggested MicroKernel API (java doc)
>> changes?
>
> I'll have one to share shortly...
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
