Hi, On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Angela Schreiber <anch...@adobe.com> wrote: > from my experience move operations are rather rare (as already > noticed by jukka). in combination with the fact that our main use > case in general involves very shorted-lived sessions i would assume that > 3b should be feasible without hampering our overall goals. i would > treat this similar to namespace remappings: the default should be > a no-op but it might get expensive if there are a lot of transient > move operations pending...
+1 assuming there's an easy way to implement this. As mentioned in my other mail, I'd really like to avoid having to introduce a lot of extra complexity or other overhead to handle this case. BR, Jukka Zitting
