Hi, On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> wrote: > Excluding those main issues the implementation already works pretty > well. It still lacks a number of features (most notably garbage > collection) and optimizations (templates, O(log n) updates of flat > nodes, etc.), but the basics are already in place. Once I sort out > some remaining merge/rebase issues, the implementation should be good > enough to pass all Oak and JCR tests (see patch below for how I'm > testing).
The implementation in latest trunk now passes all tests. BR, Jukka Zitting
