On 13.6.13 11:07, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Michael Dürig <mdue...@apache.org> wrote:
I considered that but wanted to have the stack trace in the log message
regardless of the logger message format configuration.
OK. Note thought that this approach takes away the ability of logging
frameworks to provide additional context information that the default
JVM stack trace formatting doesn't provide. For example, see
http://logback.qos.ch/reasonsToSwitch.html#packagingData.
Right. I guess we need to weight not having the stack trace at all since
the default logging configuration doesn't includes it against being able
to include additional information through configuration.
Michael
