Hi, thanks for the update. On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Jukka Zitting <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi, > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Tobias Bocanegra <[email protected]> > wrote: > > hmm, that's bad. I thought this was one of the fundamental principles > that > > allow for quick diff/merge and help identify a commit within the MVCC > > timeline. > > As mentioned by others, we actually don't need content hashes for this > and the alternatives have better performance/scalability aspects. > > What's the use case you have in mind? > * for example for NodeTypeImpl.equals() we could just compare the "hash" of the substree storing the node type definition. * for example to provide jcr:etag Regards, Toby
