On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Davide Giannella
> <giannella.dav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It would make for example a lot easier to inject a CommitHook like a
>> custom index. So far the only way to achieve so is to recompile the
>> oak-run adding .with(new MyIndexProvider()) while I'd rather add a
>> Service implementation the OSGi whiteboard.
>
> Some of us prefer to recompile the jar. :-)
>
> Of course that doesn't mean we couldn't do both. If someone's up to
> it, an OSGi-based runnable Oak jar would be a nice contribution.

I played around with the felix runtime and gogo shell in [1] but
didn't pursue this further. the problem is, that without a "launchpad"
(eg [2]) the bootstrapping is tedious.

regards, toby


[1] https://github.com/tripodsan/jackrabbit-oak/tree/OAK-17/oak-felix
[2] 
http://sling.apache.org/documentation/the-sling-engine/the-sling-launchpad.html


On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Davide Giannella
> <giannella.dav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It would make for example a lot easier to inject a CommitHook like a
>> custom index. So far the only way to achieve so is to recompile the
>> oak-run adding .with(new MyIndexProvider()) while I'd rather add a
>> Service implementation the OSGi whiteboard.
>
> Some of us prefer to recompile the jar. :-)
>
> Of course that doesn't mean we couldn't do both. If someone's up to
> it, an OSGi-based runnable Oak jar would be a nice contribution.
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting

Reply via email to