Looking at its widespread usage I think its correct and maintained. So +1 for json.org Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.resc...@gmx.de> wrote: > On 2014-03-10 13:58, Chetan Mehrotra wrote: >>> >>> and org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.commons.json does not only seem to >>> introduce a "JSOP" dependency (aren't we getting rid of that?), but also the >>> JSON support doesn't appear to support data types... >>> (JsonObject.getProperties returns a String/String map). >> >> >> In that case can we use the JSON library from json.org as thats widely >> used in projects like Sling Felix WebConsole already. So we would not >> be adding a new dependency there >> Chetan Mehrotra > > > FWIW, we the oak-blob POM also references json-simple, but it doesn't appear > to be used. > > I really don't care what JSON lib we use, but it needs to be correct, > maintained, and fast. If json.org fulfills these requirements then I'm more > than happy to switch. > > Best regards, Julian >
