> oak-doc: We only use this for the web site, so I'd rather move it out > of trunk to a separate svn subtree. There's no stopping us from > keeping version-specific copies of the documentation with this > approach (see http://tika.apache.org/ for an example), and keeping the > docs out of the release artifacts gives us a chance to improve and fix > the documentation over time.
+1 as noted earlier by michael we have a need to update the documentation after the release, which clearly indicates we should have separate sub trees in svn. regards marcel
