On 5.3.15 10:18 , Thomas Mueller wrote:
Because of OAK-2576, I think Oak 1.0.12 it not usable.
I disagree. OAK-2576 might have issues in OSGi environments where
service registration is not sufficiently cheap.
All we know for our case is that it spams the logs since Felix is so
chatty when it comes to framework events.
Michael
So I would stop work
on it. At least we don't need to update the web page (to advertise it).
On 04/03/15 20:58, "Michael Dürig" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 4.3.15 8:51 , Marcel Reutegger wrote:
Hi,
I just identified a regression in the 1.0.12 release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2576
The impact is probably only noticeable when Oak is deployed in
an OSGi container. Otherwise the GCMonitor registration with
the DefaultWhiteboard in Oak is a simple hash map operation.
I don't consider this a blocker and think we should proceed with
the release. However, I'd like to have a fix ready soon and
then create a new 1.0.13 release.
+1. Will follow up on the issue with the particulars.
Michael
WDYT?
Regards
Marcel
On 04/03/15 11:07, "Marcel Reutegger" <[email protected]> wrote:
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.12 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.0.12/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.0.
12
/
The SHA1 checksum of the archive is
c442265596bb303042b4d3b2e218201d850ec153.
A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
https://repository.apache.org/
The command for running automated checks against this release candidate
is:
$ sh check-release.sh oak 1.0.12
c442265596bb303042b4d3b2e218201d850ec153
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.12.
The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.12
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
Regards
Marcel
