Re NonLocalObservationIT, that one creates like 160'000 nodes in-memory and that seems not to fit the default VM settings. Re the other test (ConcurrentAddIT) I don't know.
Cheers, Stefan On 10/02/16 09:04, "Marcel Reutegger" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >this may solve the immediate issue with the test >failure, but it probably also hides an memory problem >with our tests. in the past I tried to first identify >and fix memory leaks and only then increase the heap >if really necessary. do you know what is holding on >to the memory? > >Regards > Marcel > >On 09/02/16 19:17, "Stefan Egli" wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>Looks like we need to give our travis run [0] more memory. OAK-3986 was >>likely partly slowing down due to memory becoming low. Now it looks like >>ConcurrentAddIT is failing [1] for the same reason too (can reproduce >>this >>locally: default memory settings result in OOME). I'm guessing adding >>this >>to the .travis.yml would do the trick? >> >>env: >> >>global: >> >>- JAVA_OPTS="-Xmx1G" >> >> >>Cheers, >>Stefan >>-- >>[0] - https://travis-ci.org/apache/jackrabbit-oak/builds >>[1] - >>Running org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.ConcurrentAddIT >>No output has been received in the last 10 minutes, this potentially >>indicates a stalled build or something wrong with the build itself. >> >>The build has been terminated >> >> >
