On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Alex Parvulescu <[email protected]> wrote: > would that be 1.0.28 instead of 1.0.27? > (sh check-release.sh oak 1.0.28 906717610585d6be9cb2abc6814083cd87ad2a3e)
yes indeed. i apologize for the copy paste error!
- [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.28 Dominique Jaeggi
- Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.28 Alex Parvulescu
- Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.28 Dominique Jaeggi
- Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.28 Amit Jain
- Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.28 Marcel Reutegger
- Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.28 Alex Parvulescu
- Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.28 Julian Reschke
- Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.28 Davide Giannella
