Thanks for the feedback. Opened OAK-4567 to track the change
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Angela Schreiber <anch...@adobe.com> wrote: > Additionally or alternatively we could create a separate method (e.g. > putOakFile > or putOakResource or something explicitly mentioning the non-referenceable > nature of the content) that uses 'oak:Resource' and state that it requires > the > node type to be registered and will fail otherwise... that would be as easy > to use as 'putFile', which is IMO important. @Angela - What about Justin's suggestion later around changing the current putFile implementation. Have it use oak:Resource is present otherwise fallback to nt:resource. This can lead to compatibility issue though as javadoc of putFile says it would use nt:resource Chetan Mehrotra
