Hi, > I would prefer to stay aligned with Maven boundaries as much as possible > as this simplifies bug reporting for parties not deeply involved with > Oak very much.
Actually, I don't think that's a problem. I wouldn't expect such a person to specify any module (logical or maven). > Most of the apparent need to break out of that scheme is > to me rather a symptom of missing modularity rather than a cure. It sounds like "modularity" for you means "Maven modularity". I don't agree this is the only "modularity" there is. > If we introduce logical modules in Jira, I strongly suggest to come up with a > clear and concise definition for them: what exactly belongs to them, > what not? Yes. And I would like to understand the reason on why we use modules (for reporting, easier to find issues,…?) Regards, Thomas
