Hi Does no reply mean that everyone agrees with the proposed steps? :-)
Kind regards Angela On 22/03/17 10:35, "Angela Schreiber" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Oak-Devs > >I just had another discussion with a colleague of mine asking why JCR >locking is not properly implemented in Oak. >Since we have to explain that so often and explain that the implementation >we have is not working, I would like to propose that we stop pretending >that we support locking in Oak. > >That would mean that we change the corresponding repository descriptor >OPTION_LOCKING_SUPPORTED to return false and adjust oak-jcr to throw >UnsupportedRepositoryOperation upon all lock calls defined by the JCR 2.0. > >At least that would be honest about what we ship and we found find out if >anybody actually needs locking. In case that was true, we could decide on >how much priority implementing locking should get compared to other stuff >on our list. > >wdyt? >angela >
