I'm in no position to veto the POC and I'm not willing to. I am well aware of the importance of this feature. I expressed my concerns and so did others. As the subject of this thread clearly stated, I only wanted to point out that I had the feeling that we had a "reboot" of the conversation for no good reason, with the unpleasant side effect of proposing once again a pattern that received a lot of criticism in the past.
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Ian Boston <[email protected]> wrote: >> ...I feel >> that Oak is weaker without the ability to offload bulk data streaming to >> infrastructure designed for that purpose.... > > FWIW as an Oak user I share that feeling, IMO the use cases described > at https://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/JCR%20Binary%20Usecase are > becoming more and more important. > > Not being a committer I don't really care about the internals, but > please do not "throw the baby out with the bath water" if the > internals need to change. > > -Bertrand
