On 29.01.2020 16:25, Angela Schreiber wrote:
Hi Julian
Not sure I got the explanation regarding 'why not branching 1.24.0' in relation to
the required changes regarding OAK-7947. According to jira that issue got fix in
1.12.0<https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project+%3D+OAK+AND+fixVersion+%3D+1.12.0>,
right? So isn't the same 'flip lazy loading of lucene index' needed irrespective of
whether we branch 1.22.0 or 1.24.0? And wouldn't the same 'newer' question you
explained below also apply when branching 1.22.0?
I guess I am missing one piece in that reasoning... otherwise I don't have a
strong preference and would be find with the proposal.
Angela
The default would need to be flipped in any case, right.
The only difference is that if we released 1.24.1 instead if 1.22.1,
users of 1.24.0 might incorrectly assume that this is a release they
should upgrade to.
That of course could be addressed by quickly releasing 1.26.0 as well,
but as we just released 1.24.0 yesterday...
Best regards, Julian
