Hi Marco

Depending on what you wish to achieve the restrictions may help. I am not sure 
if fully understood what you are aiming for so it's a bit hard to tell if 
restrictions will really do the trick.

Depending on the actual needs and how well your access control requirements fit 
into the default authorization model, it might be worth exploring the ability 
to provide a custom authorization setup. If you find yourself struggling to map 
your needs to a setup using the default authorization, exploring a custom 
implementation might be worth the effort and might also end up being more 
efficient in terms of maintaining the setup and evaluation performance... but 
it really depends on the details. In case you wish to explore that option, you 
will find some simplistic examples/exercises in the oak-exercise module.

The same exercise module also provides a few exercise lessons for restrictions 
and how to write a custom restriction provider. Obviously that's a lot easier 
that writing a custom authorization model.

Hope that helps
Angela
________________________________
From: Marco Piovesana <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 9:13 AM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: custom restrictions on ACEs

Hi all,
I have an application where the ACEs (Access Control Entries) are applied
to a node by users and by the system itself. By the user when she/he wants
to share the node with some other users, by the system when the node has to
be available to some users in automatic, under specific conditions. The
user should not be able to modify an ACE added by the system.
Right now, when I read the ACL, I can't tell what ACE has been created by
the user and what has been created by the system. Reading the documentation
I saw that one possible solution might be using custom restrictions
<https://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/security/authorization/restriction.html>
when creating the ACE, but I'm not sure this is one of the intended usage
for the restrictions. Is there a better solution for this problem?

Marco.

Reply via email to