[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.8

Checks passing for me



[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------

[INFO] Apache Maven 3.6.3 (cecedd343002696d0abb50b32b541b8a6ba2883f)

[INFO] OS name: "mac os x", version: "10.15.7", arch: "x86_64", family: "mac"

[INFO] Java version: 11.0.2, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime: 
/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/openjdk-11.0.2.jdk/Contents/Home

[INFO] MAVEN_OPTS:

[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------

[INFO] ALL CHECKS OK

[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------


From: Konrad Windszus <konra...@gmx.de>
Date: Friday, 16 July 2021 at 8:09 PM
To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org <oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.8
I unfortunately am unable to vote as I constantly run into 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FOAK-9497&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cnitigup%40adobe.com%7C45c0f654be33439018d508d9486788f6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637620431931581332%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=SAt4BUM%2B3HvTcEOWT10g0zjr%2BfdjcpdOk2QuVCYmoIA%3D&amp;reserved=0
 when building 1.22.8 locally.
Any ideas how to debug that further?
Anyone else ever experienced the same issue?
Thanks,
Konrad

> On 15. Jul 2021, at 12:04, Andrei Dulceanu <adulce...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.8 release is available at:
>
>    
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Fjackrabbit%2Foak%2F1.22.8%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cnitigup%40adobe.com%7C45c0f654be33439018d508d9486788f6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637620431931581332%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=Xx9RaG8WeDLt1QxoYjPOwe5G23Ect9fGA%2FBi%2BPnBlMo%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
> The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
>
>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsvn.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fasf%2Fjackrabbit%2Foak%2Ftags%2Fjackrabbit-oak-1.22.8%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cnitigup%40adobe.com%7C45c0f654be33439018d508d9486788f6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637620431931581332%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=3Tg%2Bpn8MeuhvvT%2FLx01P7VQaK9VGajBhBmCtOUG9Luk%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
> The SHA1 checksum of the archive is
> 7ef907eee832e254b9ec07703cc4c8d4b7fcdf40.
>
> A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
>
>    
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cnitigup%40adobe.com%7C45c0f654be33439018d508d9486788f6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637620431931581332%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=B9C%2F9U1DrcocEEUj%2BCYvCOLPXCzVir4DccdaKhueAoo%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
> The command for running automated checks against this release candidate is:
>
>    # run in SVN checkout of
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Fjackrabbit&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cnitigup%40adobe.com%7C45c0f654be33439018d508d9486788f6%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637620431931581332%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=h63t7yoNy9CJi%2B0VpuocHXChPFT1agG7te1EpMbGF20%3D&amp;reserved=0
>    $ sh check-release.sh oak 1.22.8
> 7ef907eee832e254b9ec07703cc4c8d4b7fcdf40
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.8.
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast.
>
>    [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.8
>    [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Regards,
> Andrei

Reply via email to