Hi Konrad On 03.07.23, 13:27, "Konrad Windszus" <k...@apache.org> wrote: > I would recommend to require at least OSGi R7 for Oak (released in 2018) > and at the same time no longer use the aggregate dependency but rather > the individual chapter dependencies of OSGi separately [3] which are > (from Compendium) > - Configuration Admin 1.6 > - Declarative Services 1.4 > - Metatype Service 1.4 > > Does anything speak against raising the dependencies accordingly?
Does this require any code changes? I vaguely remember an earlier attempt to update OSGi configuration related code throughout the project, which required many changes and could introduced subtle changes in behaviour if not done correctly. > Is there any known consumer still relying on Oak in an OSGi container > which is not at least R7 compliant? Can you provide more details how this manifests? Thanks. Regards Marcel
