[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13819989#comment-13819989
 ] 

Michael Marth commented on OAK-1145:
------------------------------------

{quote}
 I stumbled into the "querying JCR is bad" paradigm, therefore I wanted to try 
a more "query-less" approach [...]
{quote}

I think what is meant is: prefer walking the tree or leveraging hierarchy over 
performing a query in JR2. This is often faster (in JR2).
It has been communicated some time in order to JCR newbies who come from a RDB 
background where queries are the only way to get data. So, they would naturally 
apply this habit also to JCR when in fact there are 2 ways to get data in JCR.

I agree that with Oak the situation is different than in JR2, as you say.

> [Observation] Support for EventJournal in Oak
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-1145
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1145
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: jcr
>    Affects Versions: 0.10
>            Reporter: Daniel Platon
>              Labels: features
>             Fix For: 0.14
>
>
> Please add support for EventJournal in Oak, as it was present in Jackrabbit 2.
> Thank you.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to