[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2520?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14322553#comment-14322553
]
Francesco Mari commented on OAK-2520:
-------------------------------------
I can adapt the patch to expose checkpoints from the {{ContentRepository}}
instead of {{ContentSession}}. I could also write some more tests, including
performance tests. I just have to figure out how, since I have no prior
experience with that in this project.
The point is that I don't really know if I should go ahead with this, after the
concerns expressed on the list. Do you think this would be wasted work?
> Expose checkpoints in the ContentSession interface
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-2520
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2520
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core
> Reporter: Francesco Mari
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OAK-2520-1.patch
>
>
> Checkpoints could be an acceptable solution to implement the concept of
> "revision" described in the remote API linked from OAK-2502.
> For clients of Oak to use checkpoints, those should be exposed from the
> {{ContentSession}} API.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
