[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14622076#comment-14622076
]
Stefan Egli commented on OAK-3085:
----------------------------------
[~reschke], is the {{_modified}} a unix timestamp too (as is the newly
suggested {{_ts}}) ? If it is, what would RDB do if the
{{JournalEntry.asUpdateOp}} would try to explicitly set {{_modified}} (whereas
I assume RDBDocumentStore does this somehow too)?
> Add timestamp property to journal entries
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-3085
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3085
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core, mongomk
> Affects Versions: 1.2.2, 1.3.2
> Reporter: Stefan Egli
> Fix For: 1.2.3, 1.3.3
>
> Attachments: OAK-3085.patch, OAK-3085.v2.patch
>
>
> OAK-3001 is about improving the JournalGarbageCollector by querying on a
> separated-out timestamp property (rather than the id that encapsulated the
> timestamp).
> In order to remove OAK-3001 as a blocker ticket from the 1.2.3 release, this
> ticket is about adding a timestamp property to the journal entry but not
> making use of it yet. Later on, when OAK-3001 is tackled, this timestamp
> property already exists and migration is not an issue anymore (as 1.2.3
> introduces the journal entry first time)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
