[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Tommaso Teofili updated OAK-3866: --------------------------------- Description: Executing a query like {noformat} /jcr:root/content/foo//*[(@sling:resourceType = 'x' or @sling:resourceType = 'y') and jcr:contains(., 'bar*~')] order by jcr:content/@jcr:primaryType descending {noformat} would assume sorting on the children of resulting nodes' _jcr:primaryType_ property. That is currently not supported in Solr, while it is in Lucene as the latter supports index time aggregation. We should inspect if it's possible to extend support for Solr too, most probably via index time aggregation. The query should not fail but at least log a warning about that limitation for the time being. was: Executing a query like {nocode} /jcr:root/content/foo//*[(@sling:resourceType = 'x' or @sling:resourceType = 'y') and jcr:contains(., 'bar*~')] order by jcr:content/@jcr:primaryType descending {nocode} would assume sorting on the children of resulting nodes' _jcr:primaryType_ property. That is currently not supported in Solr, while it is in Lucene as the latter supports index time aggregation. We should inspect if it's possible to extend support for Solr too, most probably via index time aggregation. The query should not fail but at least log a warning about that limitation for the time being. > Sorting on relative properties doesn't work in Solr > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: OAK-3866 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3866 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Bug > Components: solr > Affects Versions: 1.3.13 > Reporter: Tommaso Teofili > Assignee: Tommaso Teofili > Fix For: 1.4 > > > Executing a query like > {noformat} > /jcr:root/content/foo//*[(@sling:resourceType = 'x' or @sling:resourceType = > 'y') and jcr:contains(., 'bar*~')] order by jcr:content/@jcr:primaryType > descending > {noformat} > would assume sorting on the children of resulting nodes' _jcr:primaryType_ > property. > That is currently not supported in Solr, while it is in Lucene as the latter > supports index time aggregation. > We should inspect if it's possible to extend support for Solr too, most > probably via index time aggregation. > The query should not fail but at least log a warning about that limitation > for the time being. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)