[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15223504#comment-15223504
 ] 

Vikas Saurabh commented on OAK-4167:
------------------------------------

[~teofili], [~chetanm], can you guys please review the list? Any others? Are 
there some not worth backporting?

> Collect and backport lucene based suggestion improvements done in 1.4 into 
> 1.2 branch
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-4167
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4167
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: lucene
>            Reporter: Vikas Saurabh
>            Assignee: Vikas Saurabh
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Here's a list of improvements done for lucene based suggestions that were 
> done for 1.4:
> # OAK-3156: Allows suggestions to work on non-nt:base (*r) (x)
> # OAK-3509: Returns suggesion result per row (while this isn't really 
> required, but it'd make other backports rather simple) (*r) (x)
> # OAK-3838: Fixes issues of picking up a competing-non-suggest-capable index 
> incorrectly to provide suggestions (*r) (x)
> # OAK-3149: Uses one suggest dictionary per index definition. Useful when 
> there are multiple indices supporting suggestions (*r) (x)
> # OAK-4126: Suggestion and spellcheck queries throw exception if result 
> contain lucene query character (*r) (x)
> # OAK-3157: Suggestions can work without setting aggregated full text index 
> on them (*y) (x)
> # OAK-3407: Allows to have single work suggestions instead of phrases (*g) (x)
> # OAK-2477: Namespaced global configs for suggestions (*g) (x)
> We'd also need to update docs (*r) (x)
> (*r) - Required
> (*y) - Good to have
> (*g) - Not required, but might as well be backported
> (x) - Not backported yet
> (/) - Backported



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to