[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15247496#comment-15247496
 ] 

Tomek Rękawek commented on OAK-4233:
------------------------------------

Any comments on this approach are welcome.

> Property index stored locally
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-4233
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4233
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: documentmk, query
>            Reporter: Tomek Rękawek
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.6
>
>
> When running Oak in a cluster, each write operation is expensive. After 
> performing some stress-tests with a geo-distributed Mongo cluster, we've 
> found out that updating property indexes is a large part of the overall 
> traffic. Let's try to create a new property-local index, that will save the 
> indexed data locally, without sharing it.
> Assumptions:
> -there's a new {{property-local}} index type for which the data are saved in 
> the local SegmentNodeStore instance created specifically for this purpose,
> -local changes are indexed using a new editor, based on the 
> {{PropertyIndexEditor}},
> -remote changes are extracted from the JournalEntries fetched in the 
> background read operation and indexed as well,
> -the new index type won't support uniqueness restriction.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to