[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Michael Dürig updated OAK-3893:
-------------------------------
    Component/s:     (was: segmentmk)
                 segment-next

> SegmentWriter records cache could use thinner keys
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-3893
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3893
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Technical task
>          Components: segment-next
>            Reporter: Alex Parvulescu
>            Assignee: Alex Parvulescu
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: OAK-3893.patch
>
>
> The SegmentWriter keeps a records deduplication cache ('records' map) that 
> maintains 2 types of mappings:
> * template -> recordid
> * strings -> recordid
> For the first one (template-> recordid) we can come up with a thinner 
> representation of a template (a hash function that is fast and not very 
> collision prone) so we don't have to keep a reference to each template object.
> Same applies for second one, similar to what is happening in the StringsCache 
> now, we could keep the string value up to a certain size and beyond that, 
> hash it and use that for the deduplication map.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to