[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15541979#comment-15541979
 ] 

Shashank Gupta edited comment on OAK-3253 at 10/3/16 9:30 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

> I am not sure how would the reference.key be retrieved from the Backend
[~amjain] I guess no need. FDS assumes reference.key lying in $\{path]}.  you 
can copy FDS implementation in CachingFDS.

>Would you be able to provide a patch for this.
no b/w ATM :(



was (Author: shgupta):
> I am not sure how would the reference.key be retrieved from the Backend
[~amjain] I guess no need. FDS assumes reference.key lying in ${path}.  you can 
copy FDS implementation in CachingFDS.

>Would you be able to provide a patch for this.
no b/w ATM :(


> Support caching in FileDataStoreService
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-3253
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3253
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: blob
>    Affects Versions: 1.3.3
>            Reporter: Shashank Gupta
>            Assignee: Shashank Gupta
>            Priority: Blocker
>              Labels: candidate_oak_1_0, candidate_oak_1_2, docs-impacting, 
> features, performance
>             Fix For: 1.4, 1.3.15
>
>         Attachments: OAK-3253.txt, 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.blob.datastore.FileDataStore.config
>
>
> FDS on SAN/NAS storage is not efficient as it involves network call. In OAK. 
> indexes are stored SAN/NAS and even idle system does lot of read system 
> generated data. 
> Enable caching in FDS so the reads are done locally and async upload to 
> SAN/NAS
> See [previous 
> discussions|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3005?focusedCommentId=14700801&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14700801]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to