[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15543113#comment-15543113
]
Alexander Klimetschek commented on OAK-4874:
--------------------------------------------
I would suggest "index walking" for #2. (Inspired from [traverse
synonyms|http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/traverse?s=t])
> Improve the warning logged when traversal happens within property index
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-4874
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4874
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: query
> Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra
> Assignee: Chetan Mehrotra
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.6
>
>
> Currently a traversal related warning gets logged in 2 modes
> # Actual traversal - Query execution not backed by any index
> {noformat}
> LOG.warn("Traversed " + readCount + " nodes with filter " + filter + ";
> consider creating an index or changing the query");
> {noformat}
> # Traversal within property index
> {noformat}
> LOG.warn("Traversed {} nodes ({} index entries) using index {} with filter
> {}", readCount, intermediateNodeReadCount, indexName, filter);
> {noformat}
> To allow users to better distinguish between these 2 warning we should reword
> the warning message in #2 to avoid using traversal there
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
