[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15681366#comment-15681366
]
Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-4940:
--------------------------------------
bq. I've now chosen two separate sets (parent and all) as that allows for
slightly more precise filtering (and the set should still be small, so no large
overhead expected)
+1 Makes sense. Lets treat them distinctly
> Consider collecting grand-parent changes in ChangeSet
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-4940
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4940
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core
> Affects Versions: 1.5.12
> Reporter: Stefan Egli
> Assignee: Stefan Egli
> Fix For: 1.6, 1.5.14
>
> Attachments: OAK-4940.patch
>
>
> At the moment the ChangeSet, which is populated by ChangeCollectorProvider (a
> Validator) during a commit, collects changed property names, as well as node
> name, node type and path of the parent (whereas _parent_ for a property
> change is its node, while for a node change is actually its parent).
> For improvements such as SLING-6163 it might be valuable to collect
> grand-parent changes (node name, node type and perhaps path) too. We could
> extend the ChangeSet with additional, explicit grand-parent sets (ie we
> should not mix them with the parent changes as that would lessen filtering
> rate)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
