[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15861232#comment-15861232
 ] 

Vikas Saurabh commented on OAK-5626:
------------------------------------

bq. Not super nice, but possible
I like the idea. But I'm still hoping that we agree on:
bq. not sure if it's a problem though.
:)

> ChangeProcessor doesn't reset 'blocking' flag when items from queue gets 
> removed and commit-rate-limiter is null
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-5626
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5626
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Vikas Saurabh
>            Assignee: Vikas Saurabh
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Following up on conversation at \[0]:
> {{ChangeProcessor#queueSizeChanged}} \[1] sets blocking flag to true if queue
> size is hit (or beyond). The warning "Revision queue is full. Further
> revisions will be compacted." is logged only when it *wasn't*
> blocking.
> BUT, when queue empties, blocking flag is reset inside if block for
> commitRateLimiter!=null. That means an event chain like: 
> # qFull
> # log warn
> # qEmpties
> # qFull 
> won't log the WARN after step(4)
> \[0]: http://markmail.org/message/hgein5g3ohyjhw5n
> \[1]: 
> https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/blob/trunk/oak-jcr/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/jcr/observation/ChangeProcessor.java#L307



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to