[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15876460#comment-15876460 ]
Vikas Saurabh commented on OAK-5740: ------------------------------------ [~egli], {quote} bq. may be some util class/method (exposed?? in case some external observer want it!) would be ok. what would such a util method do and how would it be used? {quote} I was mainly thinking of test scenario. So, I'd have been happy with something like (ignore syntax and compilation errors :): {code} class ConsumingListenerWrapper implements EventListener { private final EventListener delegate; private final Session changePusher; private ConsumingListenerWrapper(Session changePusher, EventListener delegate) {..} static wrap (Session cp, EventListener el) {return new ConsumingListenerWrapper(cp, el);} onEvent(EventList events) { delegate.onEvent(events); while(events.hasNext()) { Event e = events.nextEvent(); if (lastEventProcessesWas1SecondAgo) {Node n = changePusher.createNode("/var/<uuid>");changePusher.save();n.remove();changePusher.save();} } } } {code} bq. I'm not proposing that it's realistic that this issue happens, but I don't think it's only relevant in a test neither. Ack. I personally don't feel comfortable changing this part of logic - but, yes, if this is fixed, that's perfectly fine with me. > deliver overflow change even without new commit > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: OAK-5740 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5740 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Bug > Components: jcr > Affects Versions: 1.6.0 > Reporter: Stefan Egli > Priority: Minor > Attachments: OAK-5740.testcase.patch, OAK-5740.testcase.patch > > > As [reported|http://markmail.org/message/2qxle24f6zu2vpms] by [~catholicon] > on oak-dev the observation queue only delivers the so-called _overflow > entry/change_ only when new commits are 'coming in'. We might want to > consider fixing this, even though arguably this is a very rare case (since > typically the observation queue is configured to be very large) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)