[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Raul Hudea updated OAK-5874:
----------------------------
    Description: 
If a file is staged for async upload in UploadStagingCache and then another 
call to AbstractSharedCachingDataStore.addRecord is made for a file with same 
SHA1, the new call goes directly to the backed to write the file, because the 
cache is not taking into account pending uploads. This makes 2 uploads to 
happen for the same blob: one async (from UploadStagingCache) and one sync 
(from AbstractSharedCachingDataStore.addRecord  

(cc [~amitjain])

  was:If a file is staged for async upload in UploadStagingCache and then 
another call to AbstractSharedCachingDataStore.addRecord is made for a file 
with same SHA1, the new call goes directly to the backed to write the file, 
because the cache is not taking into account pending uploads. This makes 2 
uploads to happen for the same blob: one async (from UploadStagingCache) and 
one sync (from AbstractSharedCachingDataStore.addRecord  


> Duplicate uploads might happen with AbstractSharedCachingDataStore
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-5874
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5874
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Raul Hudea
>            Assignee: Amit Jain
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: OAK-5874.patch
>
>
> If a file is staged for async upload in UploadStagingCache and then another 
> call to AbstractSharedCachingDataStore.addRecord is made for a file with same 
> SHA1, the new call goes directly to the backed to write the file, because the 
> cache is not taking into account pending uploads. This makes 2 uploads to 
> happen for the same blob: one async (from UploadStagingCache) and one sync 
> (from AbstractSharedCachingDataStore.addRecord  
> (cc [~amitjain])



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to