[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15972813#comment-15972813
]
angela edited comment on OAK-6020 at 4/18/17 3:37 PM:
------------------------------------------------------
[~reschke], in the light of OAK-6069 we made some effort to get rid of the
_org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.util_ package in {{oak-core}}. would there be an
alternative place to put this utility? maybe some
_org.apache.jackrabbt.oak.commons_ package space in {{oak-commons}}? or must
{{TimeDurationFormatter}} not be used outside of the scope of {{oak-core}}?
was (Author: anchela):
[~reschke], in the light of OAK-6069 we made some effort to get rid of the
_org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.util_ package in {{oak-core}}. would there be an
alternative place to put this utility? maybe some
_org.apache.jackrabbt.oak.commons_ package space in {{oak-commons}}? or must
{{TimeDurationFormatterTest}} not be used outside of the scope of {{oak-core}}?
> add a Guava Stopwatch like duration formatter
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-6020
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6020
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: commons
> Reporter: Julian Reschke
> Assignee: Julian Reschke
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: candidate_oak_1_0, candidate_oak_1_2, candidate_oak_1_4,
> candidate_oak_1_6
> Fix For: 1.7.0, 1.8
>
> Attachments: OAK-6020.diff
>
>
> The duration formatter in {{com.google.common.base.Stopwatch}} can only be
> used when we indeed have a {{Stopwatch}} object, which is not always the case.
> {{org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.management.ManagementOperation}} has similar code
> already.
> Proposal: move that code into a separate generic class.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
