[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16194679#comment-16194679 ]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-6735: ------------------------------------- I would be in favour of supporting customer defined selectivity per property. See also: * https://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/planner-stats-details.html (search for selectivity) * https://sqlite.org/fileformat2.html#stat4tab * http://www.h2database.com/html/grammar.html#analyze (see selectivity) > Lucene Index: improved cost estimation by using document count per field > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: OAK-6735 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6735 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: lucene, query > Affects Versions: 1.7.4 > Reporter: Thomas Mueller > Fix For: 1.8 > > > The cost estimation of the Lucene index is somewhat inaccurate because (by > default) it just used the number of documents in the index (as of Oak 1.7.4 > by default, due to OAK-6333). > Instead, it should use the number of documents for the given fields (the > minimum, if there are multiple fields with restrictions). > Plus divided by the number of restrictions (as we do now already). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)