[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16243774#comment-16243774
 ] 

Andrei Dulceanu commented on OAK-6915:
--------------------------------------

[~frm], here's a couple of benchmark results when running {{BasicWriteTest}} on 
all three segment fixtures:

|Oak 1.8-SNAPSHOT *without patch*|{noformat}
# BasicWriteTest                   C     min     10%     50%     90%     max    
   N
Oak-Segment-Tar                    1      19      21      22      25      77    
2540
Oak-Segment-Tar-DS                 1      57      61      64      70     124    
 908
Oak-Segment-Tar-Cold(Shared DS)    1     183     189     198     214     295    
 211
{noformat}|
|Oak 1.8-SNAPSHOT *with patch*|{noformat}
# BasicWriteTest                   C     min     10%     50%     90%     max    
   N
Oak-Segment-Tar                    1      20      22      23      27     164    
2414
Oak-Segment-Tar-DS                 1      59      62      65      70     127    
 902
Oak-Segment-Tar-Cold(Shared DS)    1      57      62      65      70     116    
 891
{noformat}|

> Minimize the amount of uncached segment reads
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-6915
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6915
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: segment-tar
>            Reporter: Francesco Mari
>            Assignee: Francesco Mari
>             Fix For: 1.8, 1.7.12
>
>         Attachments: OAK-6915-01.patch, OAK-6915-diagnostics.patch
>
>
> The current implementation of {{SegmentCache}} should make better use of the 
> underlying Guava cache by relying on the cached segments instead of 
> unconditionally performing an uncached segment read via the 
> {{Callable<Segment>}} passed to {{SegmentCache#getSegment}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to