[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7470?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16463554#comment-16463554
]
angela commented on OAK-7470:
-----------------------------
[~rombert], thanks a lot for your thoughts.... yes... maybe it would be to keep
it separately... e.g. an interface similar to the {{ReadOnly}} and others in
the same package. I wouldn't add it to the {{Tree}} interface though because
it's really just mean to be used for the read-only trees that are just a tree
wrapper around the {{NodeState}}.
> Remove Usage of ImmutableTree and AbstractTree in Security Code
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-7470
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7470
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: authorization-cug, core, security-spi
> Reporter: angela
> Assignee: angela
> Priority: Major
> Labels: m12n
> Attachments: OAK-7470-tests.patch, OAK-7470.patch
>
>
> With a minor extension to {{TreeProvider}} we would be able to get rid of the
> direct casting to implementation details like {{ImmutableTree}} and
> {{AbstractTree}} altogether.
> [~stillalex], patch for review will follow right away.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
