[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-7254: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Indexes with excludedPaths, or includedPaths should not be picked for queries > without path > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: OAK-7254 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7254 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: lucene, query > Reporter: Thomas Mueller > Assignee: Thomas Mueller > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > Queries that don't have a clear path restriction should not use indexes that > have excludedPaths or includedPaths set, except in some exceptional cases (to > be defined). > For example, if a query doesn't have a path restriction, say: > {noformat} > /jcr:root//element(*, nt:base)[@status='RUNNING'] > {noformat} > Then an index that has excludedPaths set (for example to /etc) shouldn't be > used, at least not if a different index is available. Currently it is used > currently, actually in _favor_ of another index, if the property "status" is > commonly used in /etc. Because of that, the index that doesn't have > excludedPath has a higher cost (as it indexes the property "status" in /etc, > and so has more entries for "status", than the index that doesn't index /etc). > The same for includedPaths, in case queryPaths isn't set to the same value(s). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)