[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16857632#comment-16857632
 ] 

Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-8271:
-------------------------------------

The patch looks good to me.

> I don't think we want to "support" // necessarily

No, we don't need to support this. 

> I'm not sure where should we document this though

We could document it here:
* http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/query/grammar-xpath.html#dynamic_operand
* http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/query/grammar-sql2.html#condition

> Lucene path transformed result doesn't accomodate wildcards in relative path
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-8271
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8271
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: lucene
>            Reporter: Vikas Saurabh
>            Assignee: Vikas Saurabh
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: OAK-8271.patch
>
>
> {{LucenePropertyIndex}} support answering a query with property constraint on 
> a relative path if there's an property (non-relative) is indexed on 
> {{nt:base}}.
> e.g. with an index def such as
> {noformat}
> + /oak:index/fooIndex/indexRules/nt:base/properties
>    + foo
>        - propertyIndex=true
> {noformat}
> we can answer queries such as
> {noformat}
> /jcr:root/a//element(*, some:type)[b/foo='bar']
> /jcr:root/a//element(*, some:type)[b/c/foo='bar']
> {noformat}
> In the same spirit it could also support query with wildcard in relative path 
> fragment
> {noformat}
> /jcr:root/a//element(*, some:type)[b/*/foo='bar']
> {noformat}
> .... but it doesn't work currently.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to