[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17599277#comment-17599277
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-8840:
-------------------------------------
bq. I'm also in favour of cleaning up instead of moving the jackrabbit module
as is. E.g. I do not see any usage in Oak of classes in package
org.apache.jackrabbit.data.core. I'd rather not move them to Oak.
FWIW, the problem is org.apache.jackrabbit.core.data, not
org.apache.jackrabbit.data.core.
> move jackrabbit-data into Oak
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-8840
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8840
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: blob
> Reporter: Julian Reschke
> Priority: Major
>
> jackrabbit-data is one of the few remaining dependencies on Jackrabbit. It
> would be good to move this into the Oak project, so it can evolve at Oak's
> speed.
> [~amitj], [~mreutegg], [~mattvryan] - what do you think?
> In particular, are there parts in jackrabbit-data which should stay over
> there? For instance, I assumed that DB-backed data stores aren't used in Oak,
> but then found out about {{DbDataStoreService}}. Maybe a cleanup is needed
> first?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
