[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17752062#comment-17752062
 ] 

Manfred Baedke edited comment on OAK-10379 at 8/8/23 2:17 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

Since DynamicGroupsTest uses the same instance of DynamicSyncContext during a 
test run, it may occur that the timestamp of the DynamicSyncContext and the 
value of a rep:lastSynced property are equal, which will lead to unexpectedly 
missing syncs.


was (Author: baedke):
Since DynamicGroupsTest uses the same instance of DynamicSyncContext for all 
tests, it may occur that the timestamp of the DynamicSyncContext and the value 
of a rep:lastSynced property are equal, which will lead to unexpectedly missing 
syncs.

> DynamicGroupsTest#testCrossIDPMembership() fails occasionally
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-10379
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10379
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: auth-external
>            Reporter: Manfred Baedke
>            Assignee: Manfred Baedke
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.56.0
>
>
> [ERROR] 
> testCrossIDPMembership[name=Membership-Nesting-Depth=1](org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.security.authentication.external.impl.DynamicGroupsTest)
>   Time elapsed: 0.062 s  <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError
>         at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:87)
>         at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:42)
>         at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:53)
>         at 
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.security.authentication.external.impl.DynamicGroupsTest.testCrossIDPMembership(DynamicGroupsTest.java:317)
>         at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>         at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>         at 
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>         at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
>         at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
>         at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
>         at 
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56)
>         at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
>         at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
>         at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
>         at 
> org.junit.rules.ExternalResource$1.evaluate(ExternalResource.java:54)
>         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
>         at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
>         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
>         at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
>         at 
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
>         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
>         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
>         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
>         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
>         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
>         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
>         at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:128)
>         at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:27)
>         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
>         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
>         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
>         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
>         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
>         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
>         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
>         at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:365)
>         at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeWithRerun(JUnit4Provider.java:273)
>         at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:238)
>         at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:159)
>         at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:384)
>         at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:345)
>         at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(ForkedBooter.java:126)
>         at 
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:418)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to