[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17760305#comment-17760305 ]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-8711: ------------------------------------- trunk: (1.26.0) [98652c0008|https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/commit/98652c0008c771cd33d0b8d153f5bef397b70551] > Queries with facets should not use traversal > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: OAK-8711 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8711 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Bug > Components: core, lucene > Reporter: Nitin Gupta > Assignee: Nitin Gupta > Priority: Major > Labels: amrit, candidate_oak_1_22 > Fix For: 1.24.0 > > Attachments: OAK-8711.patch > > > Consider a scenario where a query is there with facets and the traversal cost > is less than the index cost that serves the facet query . This would be > problematic. > > In this case we should maybe set the traversal cost to infinity so that > traversal is not an option for queries with facets. > > In case there is no index available to serve this faceted query we can > probably throw an exception with a meaningful message . -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)