[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-11477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17932630#comment-17932630
]
Stefan Egli commented on OAK-11477:
-----------------------------------
Attached
[^jenkins_oak-trunk-pr_commit-8b80f50_PR-2099_build-15_oak-store-document_excerpt.txt.gz]
with the entire testLargeStartStopFiesta log drama
> Flaky test: DocumentDiscoveryLiteServiceIT.testLargeStartStopFiesta
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-11477
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-11477
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Test
> Components: documentmk
> Reporter: Julian Reschke
> Assignee: Manfred Baedke
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.78.0
>
> Attachments:
> jenkins_oak-trunk-pr_commit-8b80f50_PR-2099_build-15_oak-store-document_excerpt.txt.gz
>
>
> This test appears to be flaky:
> DocumentDiscoveryLiteServiceIT.testLargeStartStopFiesta
> Last failure:
> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit/job/jackrabbit-oak-trunk/org.apache.jackrabbit$oak-store-document/2023/testReport/junit/org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document/DocumentDiscoveryLiteServiceIT/testLargeStartStopFiesta/
> {noformat}
> Fehlermeldung
> did not renew clusterid lease
> Stacktrace
> java.lang.AssertionError: did not renew clusterid lease
> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:89)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.BaseDocumentDiscoveryLiteServiceTest$SimplifiedInstance.crash(BaseDocumentDiscoveryLiteServiceTest.java:288)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.BaseDocumentDiscoveryLiteServiceTest.doStartStopFiesta(BaseDocumentDiscoveryLiteServiceTest.java:872)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.DocumentDiscoveryLiteServiceIT.testLargeStartStopFiesta(DocumentDiscoveryLiteServiceIT.java:37)
> at
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> at
> java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
> at org.junit.rules.ExternalResource$1.evaluate(ExternalResource.java:54)
> at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1.evaluate(TestWatcher.java:61)
> at org.junit.rules.TestWatcher$1.evaluate(TestWatcher.java:61)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
> {noformat}
> Maybe a timing issue?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
