[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-11601?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17935207#comment-17935207
]
Manfred Baedke edited comment on OAK-11601 at 3/13/25 1:44 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
[~angela], what are we supposed to use if there is no OSGi environment?
was (Author: baedke):
[~angela] , what are we supposed to use if there is no OSGi environment?
> Provide a better alternative for the deprecated RootProvider, or un-deprecate
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-11601
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-11601
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Thomas Mueller
> Assignee: Angela Schreiber
> Priority: Major
>
> oak-core:
> {noformat}
> package org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.tree.factories;
> /**
> * Factory to obtain immutable {@code Root} objects.
> *
> * @deprecated Please use {@code RootProvider} instead
> */
> public final class RootFactory {
> {noformat}
> But RootProvider is an interface, and the only(?) implementation
> (RootProviderService) just calls this class as well. And we would have to
> first create a new instance.
> This was deprecated in OAK-7015 but I don't see why exactly, and what would
> be the real replacement.
> TreeFactory seems similar.
> Both RootFactory and TreeFactory are widely used. It seems before we
> deprecate things, we should have a good replacement. Replacements that just
> call the deprecated method don't seem useful.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
