[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-11397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17927467#comment-17927467
]
Julian Reschke edited comment on OAK-11397 at 4/14/25 10:23 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
But wouldn't a name be better for use in FileVault?
was (Author: reschke):
But wouldn't a name better for use in FileVault?
> Provide a way to get expanded names for items
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-11397
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-11397
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core, jackrabbit-api
> Reporter: Konrad Windszus
> Assignee: Konrad Windszus
> Priority: Major
> Labels: namespace
> Fix For: 1.78.0
>
>
> The expanded form name
> (https://developer.adobe.com/experience-manager/reference-materials/spec/jcr/2.0/3_Repository_Model.html#3.2.5.1%20Expanded%20Form)
> is in general more stable than the qualified form, due to global/session
> remappings.
> Therefore it is often beneficial to work with it. Also the JCR API only
> defines constants for the expanded form
> (https://javadoc.io/doc/javax.jcr/jcr/latest/constant-values.html).
> Although all JCR methods taking a JCR name/path accept both forms there are
> edge cases where one doesn't use it as JCR method argument.
> For example when checking if a given node name is contained in a Set of
> literals (e.g. in
> https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-filevault/blob/a2629fd3a24d35f31f0168bd6b8982db6ac62c8b/vault-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/vault/fs/filter/BaseFilter.java#L57).
> Therefore a way to get the expanded form name of a given javax.jcr.Item
> should be provided.
> Compare with the discussion at
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/jkn3fsn4fxovs5v6nygcxorm804hfz8m
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
