Option 3 On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Jim Meyer <jme...@linkedin.com> wrote: > +1 ... er, +.1 > > --j > > On May 1, 2009, at 7:55 AM, "Matt Sanford" <m...@twitter.com> wrote: > >> >> Option 3 … that's what versions are for, incrementing. >> >> On May 1, 2009, at 1:25 AM, Blaine Cook wrote: >> >>> >>> We need to build some consensus around the version preference. As I >>> see it, there are several options: >>> >>> 1. "1.0 Rev A" with no version string change (i.e., >>> oauth_version=1.0) >>> 2. "1.0a" (with oauth_version=1.0a) >>> 3. "1.1" >>> >>> Please indicate your support for one of these options, and try to >>> refrain from arguing your case here. The other thread remains open >>> for >>> that purpose. I would especially like to hear from library >>> implementers here, and others who have not voiced their opinions in >>> the other threads. >>> >>> b. >>> >>>> >> >> >> > > > > >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OAuth" group. To post to this group, send email to oauth@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to oauth+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/oauth?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
